跨文化思想家-网站首页

NO.3, 2020

上一期

封面人物访谈

蜉蝣天地话沧桑——资中筠先生专访: 资中筠，张振华; 2020, 3: 1-15.; 在线阅读下载

跨文化议题

瘟疫和人类命运的思考: 赵士林; 2020, 3: 16-23.; 在线阅读下载

整体主义是中国独特的传统吗: 宋大琦; 2020, 3: 24-28.; 在线阅读下载

重估刘谧《三教平心论》的思想史意义: 高明; 2020, 3: 29-38.; 摘要在线阅读下载; 刘谧成书于南宋末年的《三教平心论》经常被思想史叙事忽略，这既是由于思想史学者习惯于政主教辅的分析模式，多从王权角度俯视三教关系而忽略其于宋末“三教合一”大势下，仍然坚守佛教为本的保守主义立场，也决定于佛教在三教论衡中的“被解释者”的弱势身份，及刘著本身在佛教义学上的虚弱。尽管如此，《三教平心论》提出的“辨三教者，不可以私心论，不可以爱憎之心论，惟平其心念，究其极功”的思想却颇有价值；其对韩愈、宋儒排佛言论的反驳方式，又从另一侧面反映出佛教的“中国化”也是佛教义理学的衰退及空性精神的失落。

The ChinaHong Kong Crisis Toward a Creative Dialogue with Human Rights at Its Core: Joseph Wronka; 2020, 3: 39-45.; 在线阅读下载

Something to Think About: Jan Campbell; 2020, 3: 46-64.; 在线阅读下载

Women in Chinese Philosophy Ban Zhao and the Feminisation of Confucianism: Jana S. Rošker; 2020, 3: 65-73.; 摘要在线阅读下载; The problem of the relation between the female gender and Chinese philosophy is far more complex as it seems to be at the first glance. Especially if we consider many misanthrope phenomena we can encounter in the course of Chinese history, such as foot-binding or the concubinage, we might be inclined to think that female philosophy was impossible in traditional China. This paper aims to challenge the traditional views on this problem. It aims to shed some light on the fact that in this context, we have to differentiate between classical teachings that were relatively egalitarian in nature, and later ideologies that more or less openly promoted the inferior position of women in society. The paper will analyse the work of the female Han Dynasty scholar Ban Zhao (45 – 117), who was the first well-known female thinker in the history of Chinese philosophy. Through this analysis, the author also aims to expose the contradiction between dominant conventions on the one, and latent, often hidden criticism of gender relations in female writings of traditional China. In this way, the paper aims to promote a more culturally sensitive approach to the historical and conceptual study of gender discourses in China by connecting textual analyses with actua

Natural Law and Human Rights in Cross-Cultural Context: Rollin A. Van Broekhoven; 2020, 3: 74-112.; 摘要在线阅读下载; British sociologist and author, writing in his book, THE GLOBAL PUBLIC SQUARE: RELIGIOUS FREEDOM AND THE MAKING OF THE WORLD SAFE FOR DIVERSITY, wrote, “We are now seven billion people jostling together on our tiny planet earth.” He then raises the significant and profound challenge we face: “How do we live with our deepest differences, especially those differences that are religious and ideological, and especially when those differences concern matters of our public life? How do we create a global public square and make the world safe for diversity?” This challenge requires us to answer three prior questions. First, do we have reason to believe in the measureless dignity and worth of each of us? Second, do we know how to live with our deepest differences that divide us? And third, how are we to settle our deliberations and debates in public life through reasoned persuasion rather than force, intimidation, and violence, even in the age of new media, new technology, and a global resurgence of religion. As Os Guinness puts it, “indispensable to solving these challenges is the extension of soul freedom for all.” What we mean by soul freedom is that inviolable freedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief that alone does full justice to the dictates of our humanity. It expresses human dignity; it promotes freedom and justice for all; it fosters healthy giving, caring, and peaceful and stable societies as bulwarks against the countless abuses of power and equally oppression of human dignity. C. S. Lewis wrote in his book, THE ABOLITION OF MAN: HOW EDUCATION DEVELOPS MAN’S SENSE OF MORALITY, that when we appear to be saying something important about something, we are actually only saying something about our own feelings. Until modern times, all humanity believed the universe to be such that certain emotional reactions on our part could be either congruous or incongruous to it – believed that objects did not merely receive, but could merit our approval or disapproval, our reverence or out content. This paper explores these ideas in the context of meaning, natural law, human rights, and Chinese traditional culture. It also represents a mental, spiritual, and intellectual journey as I have explored these subjects, and more recently in the context of my research in China. It is a journey, and I simply do not have all of the answers to the questions.

中国思想

王康的政治情怀与行为艺术: 郑也夫; 2020, 3: 113-119.; 在线阅读下载

中国文化经典研究

帝尧: 栾贵川; 2020, 3: 120.; 在线阅读下载

《孟子》致思逻辑爬梳: 郭云鹏; 2020, 3: 121-123.; 在线阅读下载

思想家里程碑

A note on the dignificance of Leibniz's Novissima Sincia: Gregor Paul; 2020, 3: 124-126.; 摘要在线阅读下载; Leibniz (1646—1716) was convinced of what could be called "the unity of mankind." In particular, he believed in the existence of universally valid ethics. Leibniz argued for such universality from different perspectives. Thereby, he conceived of what he regarded as Confucian or Chinese teachings as important evidence for his conviction, and strongly suggested that European politicians, philosophers and theologians should utilize these teachings for correcting culturalist prejudices and defending or (further) developing universal ethics. Though Leibnizʼs interpretations of the Chinese teachings in his famous Novissa Sinica are questionable, his approach to understanding and utilizing them has remained of timeless valuable. The aim of the paper is to show that these points are still relevant. They are indispensable for coping with racism and cultural fundamentalisms. In Germany, for instance, there exist movements and organizations that—to say the least—grossly overestimate the significance of so-called cultural identity—thus falling behind even Leibniz’s philosophy. This may provoke the question of whether Germans should or could again learn from China.

思想公园

Two Letters of Solon: Solon; 2020, 3: 127.; 在线阅读下载

Funeral Oration: Solon; 2020, 3: 128-132.; 在线阅读下载

无路之路: 青岩; 2020, 3: 133-136.; 在线阅读下载

夜谈昆仑风: 欧阳祯人; 2020, 3: 137-138.; 在线阅读下载

书评

中央民族大学中华文化研究院成立仪式暨牟钟鉴先生《儒道佛三教关系简明通史》出版座谈会纪要: 李攀，段海宝; 2020, 3: 139-155.; 在线阅读下载

蜉蝣天地话沧桑：专访跨文化思想家资中筠先生

主要栏目

封面人物访谈

跨文化议题

中国思想

德国思想

中国文化经典研究

思想公园

思想家里程碑

书评